I am combining a few ideas in this post. In chapter 5 George Couros writes about leading, learning and innovating while in chapter 6 he writes about engagement versus empowerment. He also focuses on compliance and how this stifles any real, deep learning.
These are challenging chapters because schools continue to be places where compliance is valued and innovation is in short supply. As George mentions in an earlier chapter, it is not good enough to have islands of innovation, we need systems that encourage innovation and engage people in such a way that they are willing to take the risks necessary to bring about real change.
I think this is a tall order in education where compliance is valued as a way to make sure that the corporate vision is sustained.
Maybe real innovation, and real learning cannot be done on a system-wide basis. There are organizations that thrive on innovation and engagement like Google and Apple to note the two best examples. In neither corporation is compliance a core value. Valuing compliance kills creativity and invention. So how are we going to manage change and encourage innovation when we are more about ‘school’ and less about ‘learning’ as outlined in Sylvia Duckworth’s graphic above.
I would argue that there is nothing wrong with having our islands of innovation. Over time, as more people write about creativity and learning there is always the chance that these islands will grow and possibly merge into subsystems where the results of innovative, empowering leadership may be noticed as the real way to encourage student growth and creativity.
My hope is that more people will write about the innovator’s mindset and that true innovation in education will become more than a convenient label.
People who want to lead their educational community will have to seriously consider the lessons in these chapters. Leaders need to ask are they all about learning or all about school. Do they empower their staff, do they create a climate where risk taking is encouraged, have they moved away from a compliance model to one that favours empowerment of staff and students.
We are charged with developing the next generation and we need to always question and assess how we are doing. Are we creating a generation of consumers or creators?