The purpose of this post is to just make people think about the changing expectations that we have for ourselves in our changing world, and the often stagnant expectations that we have for our students. If our focus is truly on quality learning, creativity, innovation, we have to understand that a culture of compliance does not foster this for adults, nor our students.
Creativity, Daydreaming, and Cat Videos – George Couros
So much is at stake these days in education. We want to develop innovative thinkers and to do this we need to open our eyes and learn to innovate on a system-wide basis. In my experience, this is very hard to achieve.
As an administrator, I found that many colleagues would be on their e-mail or social media while at meetings at the district office.
The reason for this was pretty simple. These meetings were all about compliance and rarely about engagement or empowerment. There was little interest in engaging us as learners or even asking what we thought about the policies and practices we were being presented with.
The overall mood at these meetings was that compliance is king and we will innovate for you. As a result, many educators turned off and buried themselves in their computers.
Many of these administrators then returned to their schools and did the same thing to their staffs.
This is the plan and we all have to follow the plan.
How can we expect our teachers or students to engage when the model we experience as administrators is one based on blind compliance? How do we learn to innovate when we are not encouraged to become engaged in true decision-making about how to become innovative as a district?
When your opinion is not valued and when you are expected to comply with someone else’s ideas there is a serious disconnect.
It is possible to innovate as a system and George Couros argues that this is essential for systems to succeed. While I always see ‘islands of innovation’, I do not see districts adopting innovation as the standard and the challenge.
Can this change? Of course it can, once we engage educators in the discussion.