These graphs put out by science teacher and biostatistician, Ryan Imgrund are something I am going to watch closely over the next month.
‘On August 2, in Ottawa there is a 4.8% chance you’ll encounter an individual who can transmit COVID-19 in a group of 27.’
This is actually a statement put out on Ryan Imgrund’s Twitter feed. You can fill in the blanks for your region if you would like. How’s it going for you?
What this means should startle everyone. There is a significant risk of COVID-19 spreading in classrooms this fall. There is no hard cap for kindergarten classes or grades 4-8. Kindergarten classes can still be as high as 29 students, classes in grades 1-3 are capped at 23 (90% of classes must have 20 or fewer students).
The only meaningful caps that exist right now are in grades 9 – 12 where students will attend in groups of 15.
Not to sound overly critical, but I am not sure how this is going to work.
Today, Sunday, August 2 – Australia declares a state of disaster in Victoria and imposes curfew in Melbourne
Great Britain and Spain are beginning lockdowns again in various regions.
In the New York Times – After a brief reprieve, coronavirus charges back in US
Again the New York Times – A school reopened. It had to quarantine students within hours.
I am going to stop at four, but I could add many more stories. My point here is to state the obvious, this virus is not under control. Reopening is fraught with danger and in many cases leads to more outbreaks.
The great thing about daily statistics is that we can track the daily spread of the virus against significant changes in behaviour.
While we all should be concerned as Minister Lecce is for the emotional well-being of students, is sending them back into a very risky environment the best way to do this?
Should we not be trying to reimagine what school could look like if we were not so tied to an industrial era school model? We could be asking – what was so good about how we did things in the past? What could we do better? Why are we so tied to tradition at the risk of our student’s and teacher’s health?
Schools support the economy, there is no question about that. When kids are in school people can go back to work. If we truly were concerned about the well-being of staff and students we would be looking closely at the statistics and we would be using this time to reimagine school.
Are the people in charge of our school systems motivated to do this? People in senior positions traditionally want to protect the status quo. It is in their self-interest to do this. There is nothing amazing in this – all large corporations act in the same manner.
But what should we be doing?
Should any grouping of students be above 15?
Could we be using facilities like community and health centers to spread out our teachers and students?
Could we develop more robust video conferencing tools to make the online experience more meaningful (is there life after Zoom??)
Is five days a week, 6 hours a day really meaningful? Can we develop a community-based model for education that makes parents active partners?
We do ask these questions in countless blog posts and podcasts, but are these questions ever taken seriously? If not now, when? How tied are we really to an old model that really doesn’t work well for many kids?
I really want to see what happens in the next 30 days. Will there be meaningful debate about what education in Ontario will look like this year? Do we realize that we are in this for the long haul? There is no returning to school until there is a vaccine.
I will be working with teacher candidates in first and second year so I will certainly have lots of opportunities to see how we protect our students and staff. I will continue to look at the stats – we are very fortunate to have this daily reminder about what we are heading into.
Will we invest in real change or will we just hope for the best?
One thought on “Covid Journal # 7 – Returning to school is risky”
Pingback: This Week in Ontario Edublogs – doug — off the record