Last week I read a Twitter post from a colleague who works for my former school board it read, ‘Education is the key to making innovation the new standard.’
First, how can innovation be the standard? Innovation should be on the outside edge – innovation should be challenging the norm and innovators by their very nature are critical of the status quo.
Yesterday, I took part in a good conversation on innovation during one of the #MADPD sessions – a really different way to deliver PD unfettered by the typical school board staff who usually are the deliverers of PD to our educators. We were all very good at congratulating each other on being ‘innovative’, but I think we were all missing the point.
Innovation within a system is almost impossible. What we call innovation is usually just cheerleading, especially what we see summarized in the 140 characters of Twitter. It’s a lot of ‘look at me’ and it’s really not very helpful.
I say this because true innovation unsettles the system. The primary goal of the system, or any large institution – is to protect itself. Protection means maintaining the status quo. Innovation cannot be the ‘new standard’ because true innovation might very well call for the elimination of large education corporations like the one I worked for.
Let me be very clear. Being innovative in a system can cause a great deal of pain. The organization will do almost anything to protect itself. In my case, this resulted in a fair amount of what I call ‘institutionalized bullying’. I was seen as a pariah for some of the things I said and did and I actually retired early to avoid any further disciplinary action from my employers.
Without going into the grimy details of what happened to me, I was seen as a trouble maker because I refused to just be a cheerleader for the latest system-wide ‘innovation’.
Last year during a study on George Couros’ book, ‘The Innovator’s Mindset’ I took part in a great Voxer chat on topics connected to the book. At one point we got into a conversation on the consequences of being an innovator. I was really surprised by the number of educators who were able to admit that they too had been scapegoated by their board for working outside the norm. You could feel the hurt in their voices as they talked about what had happened to them and I realized my story was in no way unique.
So, when we have conversations about ‘jumping into the unknown’, we should really take a step back. It’s not fun to be an outrider when you work for an education corporation. You shouldn’t be congratulating yourself for being an innovator because no one really likes someone who truly thinks outside the box. If you do, you threaten the box.
So maybe we need more truth-telling on Twitter. Maybe less cheerleading and less ‘8 things you can do today to be an innovator’. Maybe we need more clear and honest criticism of a massive system that eats and spits out those who think differently.
2 thoughts on “Innovation – the New Overused Word in Education”
Thanks for the correct defining of “innovation”, and calling out its incorrect use. I have seen first-hand how the system reacts to and against those who question and call for different approaches. The typical reaction is certainly not the positive, superficial lauding of a 140-character tweet; often the opposite. People who do not automatically praise new system “initiatives” and question their efficacy are seen as oppositional, difficult and needing discipline.
Thanks as well for calling out all of those self-congratulatory tweets. We all do it, but that does not make it any less irritating. And, daunting for those of us working in the classrooms with our heads down and our minds racing to deal with so many complex situations. We don’t have time for tweets and we certainly do not feel validated by them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: About Innovative – doug — off the record